|
How do you define a protectionist? |
|
|
|
|
Posted by Mary Boote
|
|
Monday, 28 April 2008 |
|
We’ve been known to address the issue of ‘labeling’ over the years through this forum. Usually the topic du jour is food. Not this week – the discussion point is ‘labeling’ but the topic specific was presented to us via a ‘public challenge’ issued to the American public by Senator Sherrod Brown (Dem, OH) in an April 23, 2008 Wall Street Journal op-ed titled “Don’t Call Me a Protectionist”. So…who should or can be labeled a ‘protectionist’? First, we should all agree on what or who a protectionist is. Websters defines protectionist as: “an advocate of government economic protection for domestic producers through restrictions on foreign competitors.” Webster’s goes on to define a protective tariff as: “a tariff (tax) intended primarily to protect domestic producers rather than to yield revenue.”
Keeping Webster’s as the defining source, trade is: the business of buying and selling or bartering commodities, to give in exchange for another commodity”.
Using those definitions and Senator Brown’s assertion that those who ‘want more trade but with a very different set of rules’ are not protectionists – do you agree?
We respect Senator Brown for raising the issue and calling for a ‘real debate on trade’. But let’s get this straight, Senator Brown is defined as a protectionist not only because of what he says but by what he does ie…his Senate voting history. There doesn’t appear to be a trade agreement that he has or will support. Does protecting American citizens from making a profit for producing products that other people – in this country and around the world – want make him a protectionist? What do you think?
Add as favourites (43) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 335
1.4.6 |